The issue splits the conservative alliance. The Conservatives want to

As told Svenska Dagbladet last week wants Liberal Party party board have lower entry wages for young people, to tackle youth unemployment.
But further action is required, stand o food 3 turn the party's solid for the upcoming congress. In a new proposal, which is published tomorrow, suggested "a Swedish flexicurity '. Prototype is the controversial Danish model.
- We need to do more, and must leave no stone unturned in a situation where we see that we have higher youth unemployment than other countries, says Erik Ullenhag, Integration Minister and Liberal Party second vice chairman.
"If the Swedish model to work in today's working so it needs to be modernized and employment law become more attuned to the needs and conditions in the labor market today," writes FP peak in the proposal SvD seen.
- In a situation of redundancy, the employer must begin with establishing a list of priority based on competence. Since it is natural that there is a negotiation with the union, stand o food 3 but in the end determines the employer. But it all should not be correctly solved. Ultimately, the individual, or the union, get a judicial stand o food 3 review.
The new priority rules must be combined with a general unemployment insurance, a requirement that FP pushed for time, and an increased ceiling ia unemployment benefits stand o food 3 during the first 100 days. Today's unemployment insurance does not provide people with medium or higher income a "sufficient financial protection" of unemployment, says the Liberal Party. Today, stand o food 3 only people stand o food 3 earning 18,700 dollars or less a month on full time 80 percent stand o food 3 of their lost wages in compensation.
The issue splits the conservative alliance. The Conservatives want to "secure the Swedish model" of labor law and do not want to see any major changes to the current rules, stand o food 3 according to a document adopted at the party's last year. M-line declines prior to the meeting a motion from ungdomsförundet to abolish the priority rules of las.
Feel free to have your say on SvD.se. Our rules are simple: to show respect for the people we write about and other readers who comment on articles. In order to receive comment stand o food 3 on SvD.se you must register stand o food 3 an account with Disqus or use an existing account on Facebook, Google, Yahoo or OpenID. Sincerely, Fredric Karén, editor SvD.se Read the rules in their entirety
Soldier? Thought had sailors aboard ships. Moreover, germany never had skilled sailors. Heard about 1565 at Visby? To now take an example. Fixed: there was a "Germany" before 1870? .....
In general, this is quite correct thought. I would probably say it would be even better than the current system, even for those who end up far down the skill list, and thus lose their jobs. They were obviously not in the right place, but needed a kick to bounce to a job better suited for. Everyone is good at something!
But one major problem with this proposal is that there is no good way to measure competence in the workplace. The risk is high that it becomes a popularity contest instead, or a insmickrartävling where best ögontjänaren wins. The worker also gets a much harder position against a boss who can fire people a little as it wants. Then it can cost the job that dare stick their neck out and point out errors - even though in the long run is good for the company stand o food 3 because someone says it needs to be said.
It's sort of a zero sum game. No new jobs created. Those without jobs will be in at any price, but since no new jobs have been created, it becomes absurd. I had not been able to think of such a solution, even if I walked on the heaviest in a month.
What is the result? Older employees stand o food 3 may go in favor of younger ones. The pay increase that comes with employment blurred. stand o food 3 Companies stand o food 3 can see their salary stand o food 3 costs decrease. The number of unemployed is constant.
That poke in the LAS does not create new jobs. Anyone have any other opinions are welcome to submit evidence. That it can benefit the young at the expense of older employees is obvious. stand o food 3 That in its extension entails wage dumping is also obvious.
So those who advocate changes in the LAS should also be prepared to stand up to defend that unemployment among the elderly will increase, and the payroll will be reduced. Not to take this on and continue to defend the relaxation of LAS are either outright lying or a new level of hypocrisy.
- Young people find it easier to compete with older and reducing the risk that they get stuck in inaction. - Immigrants may be easier to compete with the Swedes and reducing the risk that it gets stuck in contributions / exclusion. - Sense of belonging, solidarity, loyalty increases between groups in society. - Young people and immigrants' self-esteem / confidence increases. - Swedes do not have immigrants suspicion that discrimination and racism. - The term "rip stand o food 3 out one generation at a time" may be retired. (Finally!) - DJA