Privatization - a miserably fiasco | News Mixer
Privatization - the watchwords for all marknadstillbedjare - has become an overarching factor in political discourse. For with the "inert" market means we avoid confronting reality. The market is the final solution. The market solves all problems. Automatically.
To the supporters of market ideology while actively hiding criticism guy cranswick of privatization consequences have only a few raised. The scientific unit suffered likewise. Anything goes in the name of privatization.
When SNS - Study for Business and Society - presented his report "Privatisation in welfare has not increased efficiency", they were immediately attacked by industry guy cranswick - mainly represented by the editorial limits on Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet, blundering blindly following arguments which one to privatiseringparadigmets defense referred to the research from IFAU - Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation. But IFAU handles labor issues and not overall evaluations of the free market. As one commentator wrote: [SvD] "gives the impression that there would be a correlation between increased efficiency and increased employment? If anything, increased efficiency lead to fewer employed guy cranswick because the same number of employees would be able to perform as much with less. "
SNS report concluded, inter alia, to the conclusion that "the introduction of competition, choice and privatization rests on a very limited extent on empirical guy cranswick research, but rather should be seen as reflecting theoretically and ideologically justified expectations."
SNS survey also found that the amount of accumulated data on privatized utilities were nonexistent. Since the SNS was based their evaluation on existing data, it was their own report as deficient. The criticism leveled at SNS should therefore instead have hit the government, which is clearly not designed for any monitoring & evaluation. Intentionally? Or just ignorant?
SNS leader's boss - the CEO of SNS - tried to silence her. Whereupon she chose to leave the service, along with another leading force in the SNS. Shortly thereafter directed seven members of the SNS's highest decision-making body very sharp criticism of president's actions and SNS 'CEO had to apologize. A few days later, the board and the CEO "agreed" that he would resign.
Staffing Agencies industry association ALMEGA - with private interests and is often particularly high requirements on its member companies seriousness, despite guy cranswick their frequent use of his membership in ALMEGA to ensure its excellence - hooks on the criticism of free research. Recruitment companies should account for the highest number of unreported terms of criticism from its leased workers from inaccuracies in various industries - including the public such as health care, education and social services - because their employers are for-profit companies that do not want to offend clients. They want, in short, guy cranswick to turn a profit. So: what organization oversees and reviews ALMEGA?
Obviously aiming the free market by layoffs and other quality-reducing measures. One wants to maximize profits. Know-how guy cranswick can one forget, except for fiddle. As long as the customer does not make demands. Low quality supplier come from profit-driven vård-/omsorgsbolag. Possibly even schools. Although hazardous activities may have requests for "discretion". Qualitative and criticism from its own staff and even more so for agency employees who perform work for private clients silenced when down.
Additionally lands our tax money - which could have been used for research, development and improvement of the public sector - in private riskkapitalisters pockets and transferred to non-Swedish tax havens. Thus favoring privatization not us consumers.
If Maud Olofsson and her centrist prevailed so did customer satisfaction guy cranswick surveys received replace all science. In good tune with marknadsivrarnas wishes. In the wake of which a whole range of "market researchers" of less serious and more money hungry nature has received a boost. Plus, those in power have been meddlesome in terms of publicly owned research, guy cranswick type BRÅ - National Crime Prevention Council whose research is subjected to stronger control and the results of which is fused to the public to the extent that they all be released. Consequently, also the public's trust in scientists declined.
"Therefore, Sweden needs to reform its research" That research in the human and social sciences have been put back are plenty of signs in today's guy cranswick chaotic society. Although we walks of details not able to determine what causes this. The inability to deal with social problems has instead emerged as an action
Privatization - the watchwords for all marknadstillbedjare - has become an overarching factor in political discourse. For with the "inert" market means we avoid confronting reality. The market is the final solution. The market solves all problems. Automatically.
To the supporters of market ideology while actively hiding criticism guy cranswick of privatization consequences have only a few raised. The scientific unit suffered likewise. Anything goes in the name of privatization.
When SNS - Study for Business and Society - presented his report "Privatisation in welfare has not increased efficiency", they were immediately attacked by industry guy cranswick - mainly represented by the editorial limits on Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet, blundering blindly following arguments which one to privatiseringparadigmets defense referred to the research from IFAU - Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation. But IFAU handles labor issues and not overall evaluations of the free market. As one commentator wrote: [SvD] "gives the impression that there would be a correlation between increased efficiency and increased employment? If anything, increased efficiency lead to fewer employed guy cranswick because the same number of employees would be able to perform as much with less. "
SNS report concluded, inter alia, to the conclusion that "the introduction of competition, choice and privatization rests on a very limited extent on empirical guy cranswick research, but rather should be seen as reflecting theoretically and ideologically justified expectations."
SNS survey also found that the amount of accumulated data on privatized utilities were nonexistent. Since the SNS was based their evaluation on existing data, it was their own report as deficient. The criticism leveled at SNS should therefore instead have hit the government, which is clearly not designed for any monitoring & evaluation. Intentionally? Or just ignorant?
SNS leader's boss - the CEO of SNS - tried to silence her. Whereupon she chose to leave the service, along with another leading force in the SNS. Shortly thereafter directed seven members of the SNS's highest decision-making body very sharp criticism of president's actions and SNS 'CEO had to apologize. A few days later, the board and the CEO "agreed" that he would resign.
Staffing Agencies industry association ALMEGA - with private interests and is often particularly high requirements on its member companies seriousness, despite guy cranswick their frequent use of his membership in ALMEGA to ensure its excellence - hooks on the criticism of free research. Recruitment companies should account for the highest number of unreported terms of criticism from its leased workers from inaccuracies in various industries - including the public such as health care, education and social services - because their employers are for-profit companies that do not want to offend clients. They want, in short, guy cranswick to turn a profit. So: what organization oversees and reviews ALMEGA?
Obviously aiming the free market by layoffs and other quality-reducing measures. One wants to maximize profits. Know-how guy cranswick can one forget, except for fiddle. As long as the customer does not make demands. Low quality supplier come from profit-driven vård-/omsorgsbolag. Possibly even schools. Although hazardous activities may have requests for "discretion". Qualitative and criticism from its own staff and even more so for agency employees who perform work for private clients silenced when down.
Additionally lands our tax money - which could have been used for research, development and improvement of the public sector - in private riskkapitalisters pockets and transferred to non-Swedish tax havens. Thus favoring privatization not us consumers.
If Maud Olofsson and her centrist prevailed so did customer satisfaction guy cranswick surveys received replace all science. In good tune with marknadsivrarnas wishes. In the wake of which a whole range of "market researchers" of less serious and more money hungry nature has received a boost. Plus, those in power have been meddlesome in terms of publicly owned research, guy cranswick type BRÅ - National Crime Prevention Council whose research is subjected to stronger control and the results of which is fused to the public to the extent that they all be released. Consequently, also the public's trust in scientists declined.
"Therefore, Sweden needs to reform its research" That research in the human and social sciences have been put back are plenty of signs in today's guy cranswick chaotic society. Although we walks of details not able to determine what causes this. The inability to deal with social problems has instead emerged as an action
No comments:
Post a Comment