So Jeff Eyges attended and sent in a summary. It

Go to Select Blog... ScienceBlogs Home Aardvarchaeology Aetiology paulie heenan A Few Things Ill Considered Brookhaven Bits & Bytes Built on Facts Casaubon's Book Class M Common Knowledge Confessions of a Science Librarian paulie heenan Dean's Corner Deltoid denialism blog Developing Intelligence Discovering Biology in a Digital World Dynamics of Cats Effect Measure erv EvolutionBlog paulie heenan Evolution for Everyone Greg Laden's Blog Life at the SETI Institute Life Lines Live from ESOF 2014 Omni Brain Page 3.14 Pharyngula Respectful Insolence SciencePunk Significant Figures by Peter Gleick Starts With A Bang Stoat The Corpus Callosum The Pump Handle The Weizmann Wave Thoughts from Kansas Uncertain Principles Universe USA Science and Engineering Festival: The Blog World's Fair Zooillogix 2010 World Science Festival Blog A Blog Around The Clock Adventures in Ethics paulie heenan and Science A Good Poop All of My Faults Are Stress Related Angry Toxicologist Applied Statistics Art of Science Learning A Vote For Science Basic Concepts in Science bioephemera Blogging the Origin paulie heenan Chaotic Utopia Christina's LIS Rant Cognitive Daily Culture Dish Deep Sea News Dispatches from the Creation Wars Dot Physics Dr. Joan Bushwell's Chimpanzee Refuge Eruptions evolgen Evolving paulie heenan Thoughts Framing Science Galactic Interactions Gene Expression Genetic paulie heenan Future Good Math, Bad Math Green Gabbro Guilty Planet Integrity of Science Intel ISEF Laelaps Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted) Mike the Mad Biologist Mixing Memory Molecule of the Day Myrmecos Neuron Culture Neurontic Neurophilosophy Neurotopia Not Exactly Rocket Science Obesity Panacea Observations of a Nerd Of Two Minds On Becoming a Domestic and Laboratory Goddess Oscillator Photo Synthesis Pure Pedantry Retrospectacle: A Neuroscience Blog Revolutionary Minds Think Tank Science + Society Science After Sunclipse Science is Culture ScienceOnline 2010: The Blog Science To Life Sciencewomen Seed/MoMA Salon See Jane Compute Shifting Baselines Signout Speakeasy Science Speaking Science 2.0 Stranger Fruit Superbug Terra Sigillata Tetrapod paulie heenan Zoology The Blogger SAT Challenge The Book of Trogool The Cheerful Oncologist The Examining Room of Dr. Charles The Frontal Cortex The Intersection The Island of Doubt The Loom The Primate Diaries The Quantum Pontiff The Questionable Authority The Rightful Place Project The ScienceBlogs Book Club The Scientific Activist The Scientific Indian The Thoughtful Animal The Voltage paulie heenan Gate Thus Spake Zuska Tomorrow's Table Transcription paulie heenan and Translation Walt at Random We Beasties White Coat Underground Search National Geographic
This paulie heenan was predictable. As I mentioned , there was a lecture by a Scientist with a Ph.D. in Science from Harvard on Sunday, by a fellow named Dr Nathaniel Jeanson, which is part of a fairly typical trend nowadays: paulie heenan the devout paulie heenan creationist who grinds his way through a graduate program to earn an advanced degree so he can disregard everything he learned to wave his title like a victory flag and pretend to an authority he does not have. Other well-known examples are Jonathan Wells and Marcus Ross — their degrees are meaningless since they clearly prioritize the trappings of authority over the substance of knowledge.
So Jeff Eyges attended and sent in a summary. It’s no surprise: Jeanson has this fancy degree, but his talk was all straight out of the quaint old 1960s “Scientific Creationism” handbook, full of bogus arguments and obfuscatory handwaving over science the speaker doesn’t understand.
As I told Catherine Dulac, his former dept. head at Harvard, it was an hour-long spectacle of misinformation, half-truths and what appeared to be deliberate obfuscation. Most of this (probably all of it) you’ve heard before. He began by contrasting Evolutionary Theory and Creationism. Evolution, he said, admits only naturalistic explanations, discounts eyewitness testimony (i.e., the Bible) and insists upon uniformitarianism. Naturally, he sees these as weaknesses.
He then listed the similarities; strangely he listed speciation (I thought they didn’t even like the word) under “Microevolution”. He then pulled out what I imagine was the most nihilistic quote by a scientist (regrettably, paulie heenan I didn’t write down the name) he could find, to the effect that evolution paulie heenan demonstrates that there is no purpose to life, no ethics, no free will, etc. He did say that not all atheists have this view, but, of course, it was calculated to appeal to the Christians in the audience; they gasped and shook their heads appropriately (I should mention that the event was sponsored by an evangelical church; yes, we have a few in Boston!). They were primed.
He then began to weave tortuous arguments from geology and astronomy, disciplines in which he apparently has no training and upon which he isn’t qualified to draw (I’m not sure he’s qualified to draw upon biology). Astron