Monday, November 25, 2013

The political struggle that led to the winner, such as a candidate for the votes of 51 per cent of


In today's society, and people are constantly faced with the problem of the power of the instrument lends itself to risk and suffer from severe consequences. So far, not been able to find this problem fully democratic solution. The Green Book provides power tools to a comprehensive settlement.
All the modern world of the political system in season produce has encountered an instrument of power struggles in season produce as a result - no matter whether it is armed or peaceful classes, clans, tribes, parties or individuals fight. In this battle in season produce always wins power tool - a person or a class party. The losers ever remain in the nation, so to practice democracy.
The political struggle that led to the winner, such as a candidate for the votes of 51 per cent of voters, leading to democratic rule toga veiled dictatorship of the instrument of victory, with the other 49 percent of the electorate in season produce turns out to be subject to the power of the instrument for which they have not voted, but that they are forced . It also has a dictatorship. This kind of political battles often ending with the victory in season produce of the instrument of power, representing the minority that it happens if votes are divided among several candidates, and one of them has received more votes than any of the others, taken separately. If the sum of the other candidates received the number of votes, it turns out that it constitutes a majority, in season produce although it is believed that a candidate has won the first plus a legitimate, democratically! In fact, it is obvious dictatorship false mask of democracy. This is for all of today's political regime face. Or it is not clear that all of them falsify genuine democracy and is essentially a dictatorial regime? PARLIAMENTS
Parliament's primary mission is to speak on behalf of the people, which in itself is not democratic, in season produce because the word "democracy" we mean the power of the people. The very fact implies the existence of parliamentary rule without the people. True democracy is only possible with the same people, not only with the participation of representatives.
Parliaments have become barriers to legitimate popular way to power, they are atbīdījuši masses in season produce from participating in politics and monopolized the power. The people are left to clean a show, forged in democracy - the right to stand in long lines at the polls at the polling stations.
To discover the real identity of parliaments, will return to their country of origin. Parliament shall elect either the entire population of polling stations, or parties and coalitions. They also tend to mean. All these methods can not be considered democratic, because in season produce the division of the population along the polls means that one member representing the thousands, in season produce tens of thousands and sometimes hundreds of thousands or millions of people, depending on the number of voters. This means that the member has nothing to do with voters close organizational links, although he, like the other members, counts - the representative of his people.
From the above we can see that the traditional, the modern world provides a parliamentary democracy the dominant member in season produce of the inviolability and creates a halo around him, at the same time refusing to give such rights to ordinary people. This means that parliaments have become popular usurpation of power and misappropriation of funds. Peoples have the right to popular revolution to fight for it, to destroy democracy called on the parliaments of monopolization of the tools and tell them: NO REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE!
If parliament has drawn a lot of elections won, then it is not popular, but a lot of the Parliament, which represents a particular party, not the people. The parliament appointed executive power represented by the winning parties rather than people power.
The same is true of the parliament, in season produce in which each party receives a number of places. These sites are occupied by members of his party, not the people's representatives. Authorities of the government, which has set up a coalition, representing the coalition, rather than people power.
Such regimes are becoming popular on the brothers' in season produce victims of war. Political opponents through the people in the struggle for power. to get the required number of votes, cheat and exploits people. But the people submissive to the Holy Rosary moving long lines to throw in the ballot box their newsletters. (Just like they're thrown into the waste bin a piece of paper.) This is the modern world's dominant democracy, no matter whether it run a one-party, in season produce two-party, multi-party in season produce system - or the system in which all, there are no parties.
From what is being said it becomes clear that the parliamentary in season produce missions have been mine. In the case of parliaments, which are molded Members of the appointment or the path is based on the seats in the succession law, it should be said that they are generally not considered to be one of the forms of democracy. In addition, since the parliamentary election system based on canvassing the votes of the acquisition, it is in the true sense manipulative system because votes can be bought or biased misrepresent their numbers. But the poor can not compete with the rich pre-election campaigns, so always wins the rich, only the rich!
Representative governance

No comments:

Post a Comment